Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 07:54

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Taraji P. Henson says Hollywood went silent after her Oscar nod—until Tyler Perry called - TheGrio
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Scientists stunned as underwater volcano unleashes over a million giant eggs - Glass Almanac
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why did the UK Supreme Court rule that transgender women are not women?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is your favourite true story to tell at a party?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Former Player Gives Definitive Verdict on Knicks Firing Tom Thibodeau - Athlon Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
2025 NBA Finals MVP Rankings: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Tyrese Haliburton and More - Bleacher Report